Atomic commits and rollback
Import sample data, fix validation errors, switch to reviewer to approve, then commit as administrator.
Map CSV columns, resolve invalid rows, approve a migration and reconcile the result.
Opens migration.taiphamsolutions.com in a new tab. No account, no signup, and nothing you do in it leaves your browser.
Map CSV columns, resolve invalid rows, approve a migration and reconcile the result.
Import sample data, fix validation errors, switch to reviewer to approve, then commit as administrator.
Import sample data, fix validation errors, switch to reviewer to approve, then commit as administrator.
Seeded examples use English names. Switch between English and Vietnamese.
Import sample data, fix validation errors, switch to reviewer to approve, then commit as administrator.
Switch roles to explore workflow permissions. This is not secure authentication.
Every step below happens inside the demo. There is no point in it where the work leaves the browser and comes back.
Import sample data, fix validation errors, switch to reviewer to approve, then commit as administrator.
Reload the page to inspect the records saved in your browser.
There is no server behind any of this, which decides both columns. The left one is what that constraint made worth building properly. The right one is what it rules out.
The write-up sells harder than the application does, so it is on the page rather than in a repository nobody can open.
A demo exists to prove something on the offer list rather than to be impressive on its own. These are the ones this one argues for.
Each one is a different kind of problem, and all of them are in the Demos menu at the top of the page.
This one was built to a constraint nobody would choose. Yours would have a server, real accounts, and the parts of the domain that are actually hard. Tell us what the software has to do and we will tell you what it takes.
Bring the messy version of the problem. That is the conversation we enjoy most.